ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
3D data-augmentation methods for semantic segmentation of tomato plant parts.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Projecting 2D top-view of PSII efficiency onto 3D plant models to quantify PSII efficiency across canopy layers.Plant methods · 2026Article
- SOY3DSEG: A high-precision universal point cloud segmentation model for soybean full growth period based on improved point transformer.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- A distributed segmentation strategy developed for three-dimensional leaf trait quantification of tomato plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Mapping of cotton bolls and branches with high-granularity through point cloud segmentation.Plant methods · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: 3D semantic segmentation of plant point clouds is an important step towards automatic plant phenotyping and crop modeling. Since traditional hand-designed methods for point-cloud processing face challenges in generalisation, current methods are based on deep neural network that learn to perform the 3D segmentation based on training data. However, these methods require a large annotated training set to perform well. Especially for 3D semantic segmentation, the collection of training data is highly labour intensitive and time consuming. Data augmentation has been shown to improve training on small training sets. However, it is unclear which data-augmentation methods are effective for 3D plant-part segmentation. Methods: In the proposed work, five novel data-augmentation methods (global cropping, brightness adjustment, leaf translation, leaf rotation, and leaf crossover) were proposed and compared to five existing methods (online down sampling, global jittering, global scaling, global rotation, and global translation). The methods were applied to PointNet++ for 3D semantic segmentation of the point clouds of three cultivars of tomato plants (Merlice, Brioso, and Gardener Delight). The point clouds were segmented into soil base, stick, stemwork, and other bio-structures. Results and disccusion: Among the data augmentation methods being proposed in this paper, leaf crossover indicated the most promising result which outperformed the existing ones. Leaf rotation (around Z axis), leaf translation, and cropping also performed well on the 3D tomato plant point clouds, which outperformed most of the existing work apart from global jittering. The proposed 3D data augmentation approaches significantly improve the overfitting caused by the limited training data. The improved plant-part segmentation further enables a more accurate reconstruction of the plant architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.