Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377756›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2023

Maternal consumption and perinatal exposure to non-nutritive sweeteners: should we be concerned?

Francisca Concha, Verónica Sambra, Paola Cáceres, Sandra López-Arana, Bielka Carvajal, Martín Gotteland

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Food sweeteners: Angels or clowns for human health?Current research in food science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisca ConchaDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Verónica SambraDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Paola CáceresDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Sandra López-AranaDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Bielka CarvajalDepartment of Women and Newborn's Health Promotion, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Martín GottelandDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
University of Chile · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The context for this review is the rapid increase in the use of non-nutritive sweeteners (NNSs) instead of sugar in foods and beverages, a situation so prevalent in some countries that consumers are finding it increasingly challenging to access foods without NNSs. The benefits of consuming NNSs on obesity and diabetes are now being questioned, and studies have shown that they may exert physiological activities, sometimes independently of sweet taste receptor stimulation. Few studies, limited mainly to North American and European countries, have described the consumption of NNSs by pregnant or lactating women and infants. Most focus on beverages rather than foods, but all agree that consumption levels have increased dramatically. Although some studies report a negative impact of NNSs on the risk of preterm birth, increased birth weight and decreased gestational age, the level of evidence is low. Several studies have also reported increased weight gain in infancy, associated with maternal NNS intake. Interestingly, several NNSs have been detected in amniotic fluid and breast milk, usually (but not always) at concentrations below their established detection limit in humans. Unfortunately, the impact of chronic exposure of the fetus/infant to low levels of multiple NNSs is unknown. In conclusion, there is a stark contrast between the galloping increase in the consumption of NNSs and the small number of studies evaluating their impact in at-risk groups such as pregnant and lactating women and infants. Clearly, more studies are needed, especially in Latin America and Asia, to fill these gaps and update recommendations.

Indexed as

acesulfame (ACE)amniotic fluidbreast milkneonatal exposurenon-communicable disease (NCD)steviol glucosidessucralosesweet taste receptors

Identifiers

PMID37377756
PMCPMC10291189
OpenAlexW4380264335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.