Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377728›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America2023

Template independent component analysis with spatial priors for accurate subject-level brain network estimation and inference.

Amanda F Mejia, David Bolin, Yu Ryan Yue, Jiongran Wang, Brian S Caffo, Mary Beth Nebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amanda F MejiaDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47408.
David BolinCEMSE Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.
Yu Ryan YuePaul H. Chook Department of Information Systems and Statistics, Baruch College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, 10010.
Jiongran WangDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47408.
Brian S CaffoDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205.
Mary Beth NebelCenter for Neurodevelopmental and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, 21205.

Funding

Project-004U54DA049110 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Martin Lindquist · 2019 to 2026
$14.7M
TRD 4: Platforms for multi-modal and multi-scale imaging dataP41EB031771 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Peter CM Van Zijl · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
Statistical Methods for Multilevel Multivariate Functional StudiesR01NS060910 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Ciprian M Crainiceanu · 2009 to 2026
$8.3M
Statistical methods for structural and functional integration in multi-modal neuroimaging dataR01EB029977 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAFFO, BRIAN SCOTT · 2021 to 2024
$1.9M
Bayesian methods for cortical surface neuroimaging dataR01EB027119 · NIBIB · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MEJIA, AMANDA · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
Visual-Motor Development in Infants at High Risk for AutismK01MH109766 · NIMH · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI NEBEL, MARY BETH · 2016 to 2020
$753k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031771NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027119NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029977NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA049110NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH109766NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Independent component analysis is commonly applied to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data to extract independent components (ICs) representing functional brain networks. While ICA produces reliable group-level estimates, single-subject ICA often produces noisy results. Template ICA is a hierarchical ICA model using empirical population priors to produce more reliable subject-level estimates. However, this and other hierarchical ICA models assume unrealistically that subject effects are spatially independent. Here, we propose spatial template ICA (stICA), which incorporates spatial priors into the template ICA framework for greater estimation efficiency. Additionally, the joint posterior distribution can be used to identify brain regions engaged in each network using an excursions set approach. By leveraging spatial dependencies and avoiding massive multiple comparisons, stICA has high power to detect true effects. We derive an efficient expectation-maximization algorithm to obtain maximum likelihood estimates of the model parameters and posterior moments of the latent fields. Based on analysis of simulated data and fMRI data from the Human Connectome Project, we find that stICA produces estimates that are more accurate and reliable than benchmark approaches, and identifies larger and more reliable areas of engagement. The algorithm is computationally tractable, achieving convergence within 12 hours for whole-cortex fMRI analysis.

Indexed as

Bayesian MethodsComputationally Intensive MethodsExpectation-maximizationNeuroimagingSpatial Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37377728
PMCPMC10292763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.