ArticleCurrent addiction reports2021
Improving Translational Research Outcomes for Opioid Use Disorder Treatments.
Article in Current addiction reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sublingual dexmedetomidine (BXCL501) reduces opioid withdrawal symptoms: findings from a multi-site, phase 1b/2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse · 2023Trial
- The effects of acute oral naltrexone pretreatment on the abuse potential of intranasal methamphetamine, and the relationship between reward/punishment sensitivity and methamphetamine's effects.Behavioural pharmacology · 2022Trial
- Cold nociception as a measure of hyperalgesia during spontaneous heroin withdrawal in mice.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024Article
- Interactions between lorcaserin and opioids: Ventilation and food-versus-drug choice.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024Article
- The potential role of opioid vaccines and monoclonal antibodies in the opioid overdose crisis.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2023Article
- The subjective experience of heroin effects among individuals with chronic opioid use: Revisiting reinforcement in an exploratory study.Addiction neuroscience · 2022Article
- Generalizability and representativeness: Considerations for internet-based research on substance use behaviors.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Un-Meetings as tools for translational idea generation: A semantic content analysis of an Opioid Crisis Un-Meeting.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Targeting Unmet Clinical Needs in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Pharmacotherapies are the most effective means of reducing the harms associated with opioid use disorder (OUD). Translational research seeking to develop novel medications to treat OUD has been challenging due to the complex etiology of addiction. Preclinical outcome measures are often behavioral, and it is difficult, if not impossible, to fully mirror the various emotional and cognitive processes that motivate opioid use in humans. The goal of the current narrative review was to summarize the translational progression of three potential medications for OUD, which had varying levels of success. Recent Findings: Memantine, lorcaserin, and lofexidine all showed promise in preclinical studies; however, only lofexidine was able to consistently replicate these findings in human subjects, and receive FDA approval. It was the authors' objective to use this review to identify areas of needed improvement in translational research for OUD. Summary: Preclinical studies vary significantly in their ability to forecast effectiveness in clinical trials. Among the various preclinical models, suppression of opioid self-administration appears to have the best predictive validity. As they model a mostly physiological phenomenon, preclinical assessments of opioid withdrawal also appear to have high predictive validity. In our review of the literature, the authors noted numerous examples of clinical trials that were underpowered, lack precision, and proper outcomes. Better-validated preclinical targets and improved design of proof-of-concept human studies should allow investigators to more efficiently develop and test medications for OUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.