ArticleCancer research communications2023
A Mendelian Randomization Analysis of 55 Genetically Predicted Metabolic Traits with Breast Cancer Survival Outcomes in the Pathways Study.
Article in Cancer research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polygenic Risk for Cardiometabolic and Cardiovascular Disease in a Multiethnic Cohort of Breast Cancer Survivors.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Causal Relationships Between Plasma Metabolites, Inflammatory Factors, and Oral Cancer Risk: A Comprehensive Mendelian Randomization Study With Mediation Analysis.Human mutation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies suggest associations of metabolic syndromes with breast cancer prognosis, yet the evidence is mixed. In recent years, the maturation of genome-wide association study findings has led to the development of polygenic scores (PGS) for many common traits, making it feasible to use Mendelian randomization to examine associations between metabolic traits and breast cancer outcomes. In the Pathways Study of 3,902 patients and a median follow-up time of 10.5 years, we adapted a Mendelian randomization approach to calculate PGS for 55 metabolic traits and tested their associations with seven survival outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to derive HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with adjustment for covariates. The highest tertile (T3) of PGS for cardiovascular disease was associated with shorter overall survival (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.11-1.61) and second primary cancer-free survival (HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.12-1.53). PGS for hypertension (T3) was associated with shorter overall survival (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.00-1.43), second primary cancer-free survival (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.06-1.45), invasive disease-free survival (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.01-1.38), and disease-free survival (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.04-1.39). PGS for serum cystatin C levels (T3) was associated with longer disease-free survival (HR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.71-0.95), breast event-free survival (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.61-0.91), and breast cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.54-0.95). The above associations were significant at a nominal Significance: To our knowledge, this is the largest study of PGS for metabolic traits with breast cancer prognosis. The findings revealed significant associations of PGS for cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and cystatin C levels with several breast cancer survival outcomes. These findings implicate an underappreciated role of metabolic traits in breast cancer prognosis that would warrant further exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.