Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377570›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2023

From niche topic to inclusion in the curriculum - design and evaluation of the elective course "climate change and health".

Dorothea Lemke, Svea Holtz, Meike Gerber, Olga Amberger, Dania Schütze, Beate Müller, Armin Wunder, Marischa Fast

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Current status and challenges of planetary health education: a scoping review.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Drawing a line from COBMC medical education · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The climate crisis and planetary health in teaching.GMS journal for medical education · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorothea LemkeGoethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Svea HoltzGoethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Meike GerberGoethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Olga AmbergerGoethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Dania SchützeGoethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Beate MüllerGoethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Armin WunderGoethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Marischa FastGoethe-University Frankfurt a.M., Institute of General Practice, Frankfurt a.M., Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEDAK-Gesundheit (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: At the Medical Faculty of the Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, the elective course "climate change and health" was offered to students in the clinical phase of their medical studies for the first time in the winter semester 2021/22 (any unfilled places were made available to interested students studying other subjects). Despite attracting considerable attention, this topic has not yet been incorporated into the curriculum of medical studies. Our aim was therefore to teach students about climate change and discuss its effects on human health. The students evaluated the elective in terms of various factors relating to knowledge, attitudes and behavior. Project description: The elective focused on the concept of Planetary Health, with an emphasis on the health consequences of climate change, as well as possibilities for action and adaptation in clinical and practical settings. The course took place in three live, online sessions (with inputs, discussion, case studies and work in small groups), as well as online preparation and a final written assignment for which students were asked to reflect on the subject. The standardized teaching evaluation questionnaire (=didactic dimension) of Goethe University was used online to evaluate the elective, whereby the questionnaire was extended to include the measurement of changes in students' agreement with items (dimensions) relating to knowledge, attitudes and behavior (personal behavior and behavior as physicians) before and after the course (pre/post comparison). Results: Students expressed high levels of satisfaction with the course content, the presentation of the course, and the organization of the elective. This was reflected in very good to good overall ratings. The pre/post comparisons further showed a significant, positive shift in agreement ratings in almost all dimensions. The majority of respondents also wanted the topic to be firmly embedded in the medical curriculum. Conclusion: The evaluation shows that with respect to the impact of climate change on human health, the elective course had a clear influence on the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of the students. In view of the relevance of the topic, it is therefore important that this subject is included in medical curricula in the future.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduatePhysiciansStudents, MedicalClimate ChangeCurriculumFaculty, MedicalHumansStudentsclimate changeevaluationhealthmedical educationteaching

Identifiers

PMID37377570
PMCPMC10291346
OpenAlexW4382344598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.