ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Healthy immigration effect among internal migrants in megacities: a cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- National and subnational burden of mental disorders in China, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Integrating migration into cancer geography: spatial clustering of five digestive cancer burden in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The experience of a multidisciplinary team in welcoming vulnerable migrants in a rural Italian reception centre: a study using multidimensional textual analysis.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To verify the healthy immigration effect on self-rated health (SRH) among Chinese internal migrants, identify the determinants of SRH, and provide recommendations for the Chinese government to formulate effective intervention strategies to improve population governance and health management in megacities. Methods: A sample comprising 1,147 white-and blue-collar migrant workers was randomly selected through an online survey conducted in Shanghai from August to December 2021. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to verify the healthy immigration effect as well as determinants of the effect among internal migrants in Shanghai. Results: Among 1,024 eligible internal migrants, 864 (84.4%) were aged between 18 and 59 years, 545 (53.2%) were men, and 818 (79.9%) were married. When confounders in the logistic regression models were adjusted, the odds ratio of SRH for internal migrants who had lived in Shanghai for 5-10 years was 2.418 ( Conclusion: A healthy immigration effect was observed among internal migrants in Shanghai. The migrant population that had lived in Shanghai for 5-10 years had more health advantages than the locals, whereas those who had lived there for ≥10 years did not. The Chinese government should understand this effect and enact measures accordingly, such as implementing physical examinations, improving acculturation, addressing individual characteristics, and improving socioeconomic conditions to improve the physical and mental health of internal migrants. Enacting such changes could facilitate the integration of migrants into the local culture of megacities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.