ArticleCJC open2023
Awareness Among Primary Care Physicians in Canada of Guideline Recommendations for Lowering LDL-Cholesterol in High-Risk Patients.
Article in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Modern therapy of patients with lupus erythematosus must include appropriate management of their heightened rates of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events: a literature update.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Review
- Learnings from Implementation Strategies to Improve Lipid Management.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular (CV) risk management for high-risk patients is often provided by primary care physicians (PCPs). We surveyed Canadian PCPs regarding their awareness and implementation of the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) lipid guideline recommendations for patients following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and those with diabetes but without CV disease. Methods: A committee of PCPs and specialists with lipid expertise, including some 2021 CCS lipid guideline coauthors, designed a survey to probe PCP awareness and practice patterns regarding CV risk management. From a national database, a total of 250 PCPs completed the survey between January and April 2022. Results: Almost all PCPs (97.2%) concurred that a post-ACS patient should be seen by their PCP within 4 weeks of hospital discharge (81.2% said within 2 weeks). Almost half (44.4%) responded that discharge summaries provided inadequate information, and 41.6% felt that lipid management post-ACS was the responsibility primarily of specialists. A total of 58.4% articulated that they face challenges when seeing a post-ACS patient, related to inadequate discharge information, complexities of polypharmacy and duration of therapies, and managing statin intolerance. A total of 63.2% and 43.6% correctly identified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) intensification thresholds of 1.8 mmol/L in post-ACS patients, and 2.0 mmol/L in diabetes patients, respectively, and 81.2% incorrectly thought that proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors were indicated for patients with diabetes but without CV disease. Conclusions: One year following publication of the 2021 CCS lipid guidelines, our survey reveals knowledge gaps among responding PCPs regarding intensification thresholds and treatment options for patients post-ACS, or those with diabetes. Innovative and effective knowledge-translation programs to address these gaps are desirable.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.