ArticleThe journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM
Virtual Anesthesiology Medical Student Learning Program Pilot Designed in Response to COVID-19.
Article in The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This learning opportunity was designed to provide an interactive, virtual, educational anesthesiology program for interested medical students and to offer an opportunity to learn more about an institutional culture through a question and answer (Q&A) with program faculty preceptors for the 2020-2021 anesthesiology residency application cycle. We sought to identify if this virtual learning program was a valuable educational tool through a survey. Methods: A short Likert-scale survey was sent to medical students before and after participation in a session using REDCap electronic data capture tool. We designed the survey to assess the program's self-reported effect on participants' anesthesiology knowledge, and whether the program design was successful in creating a collaborative experience while also providing a forum to explore residency programs. Results: All respondents found the call useful in building anesthesiology knowledge and networking, and 42 (86%) found the call helpful in deciding where to apply for residency. Overall, 100% of respondents found the call useful, collaborative, engaging, and important to define critical thinking skills. Conclusions: The framework used for this program-virtual asynchronous and synchronous problem-based learning-can be applied broadly with potential benefit to medical student participants challenged by the cancellation of clinical rotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.