Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377490›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in food science2023

The future is crawling: Evaluating the potential of insects for food and feed security.

Giovanni Sogari, Mario Amato, Rossella Palmieri, Jasmine Hadj Saadoun, Giulia Formici, Fabio Verneau, Simone Mancini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in food science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effect of Dietary Inclusion of Full-Fat Insect Meals (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Have the environmental benefits of insect farming been overstated? A critical review.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Antibiotic Resistance in Enterococci andPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giovanni SogariDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 49/a, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Mario AmatoDepartment of Political Science, University of Naples Federico II, Via Rodinò 22/A, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Rossella PalmieriDepartment of Political Science, University of Naples Federico II, Via Rodinò 22/A, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Jasmine Hadj SaadounDepartment of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 49/a, 43124, Parma, Italy.
Giulia FormiciDepartment of Italian and Supranational Public Law, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Fabio VerneauDepartment of Political Science, University of Naples Federico II, Via Rodinò 22/A, 80138, Naples, Italy.
Simone ManciniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current estimations showed that the number of people affected by hunger doubled in the last two years, reaching 9.8% of the global population. According to FAO, in order to satisfy the demand for food in the next few years, it will be necessary to double food production. Moreover, the call for a change in dietary patterns has been raised, showing how the food sector is responsible of 1/3 of climate change where meat-based diets or overconsumption of meat play an important role in the negative environmental impact. Consequently, there is a growing concern in how to achieve the goal of increasing food productions without exploiting environmental resources and to explore the production and use of alternative resources, such as insects. Insects are gaining interests both as food and feed not only to reduce the environmental costs in feed production for common livestock, but also to reduce farmers' dependence on traditional protein sources. In this work we aimed to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art upon insect studies, highlighting the most important results obtained from both an industrial and market perspective. The legislative framework concerning edible insects as food and feed is also analyzed, with the final purpose to highlight recent reforms, relevant case-law as well as unsolved regulatory challenges. From a normative perspective, regulatory efforts are still required to fully take advantage of the potentialities of insects-industry. From a consumer point of view, consumers' willingness to pay a premium is going to be a key issue for economic sustainability of the insect farming chain. To meet the food and feed security challenges, insects will have to be considered all-around, including applications in the food, feed, and other sectors. We believe that this review is an important contribution to the field of food science and will be of interest to researchers, food industry professionals, and policymakers in order to prioritize research questions and help communicate scientific knowledge to a broader audience.

Indexed as

Consumer behaviourEntomophagyIndustrial applicationsNovel foodsRegulation (EU) 2015/2283SDGsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID37377490
PMCPMC10290996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.