ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology reports2023
Longitudinal characteristics of insight and clinical factors in patients with schizophrenia.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal characteristics of insight and clinical factors in patients with schizophrenia.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsSchizophrenia is a psychiatric disorder presenting a lack of insight. Although insight changes over time, longitudinal studies of insight in schizophrenia are scarce. Furthermore, most previous studies on insight and intelligence have not measured full-scale IQ and have not been able to examine the relationship between detailed dimensions of cognitive function and insight. In this study, we assessed insight at two time points and assessed dimensions of cognitive function.
methodsA total of 163 patients with schizophrenia participated in the study. We evaluated insight at two time points to understand the patterns of change and examined the association between insight and clinical variables. Additionally, we examined the relationship between the dimensions of cognitive function and insight.
resultsThe patients were divided into three groups based on their change in insight over time: stable at a low level of insight (poor insight), stable at a high level of insight (good insight), and changed in insight over time (unstable insight). Those in the poor insight group had lower general intelligence scores than those in the good insight and unstable insight groups. Regarding cognitive function, verbal comprehension was associated with the level of insight at baseline and follow-up. Regarding psychiatric symptoms, the poor insight group exhibited more severe symptoms than the other two groups, especially regarding positive symptoms.
conclusionsOur classification of patients based on changes in insight revealed that poor insight patients had impaired cognitive function, especially verbal comprehension, and more severe positive symptoms than good insight or unstable insight patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.