Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377331›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2023

Unplanned pregnancy in Brazil: national study in eight university hospitals.

Tainá Vieira Nilson, Angélica Amorim Amato, Ceres Nunes Resende, Walquíria Quida Salles Pereira Primo, Roseli Mieko Yamamoto Nomura, Maria Laura Costa, Maria Lúcia Opperman, Marianna Brock, Alberto Trapani Junior, Lia Cruz Vaz da Costa Damasio and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Temporal trend of vasectomies in Brazil and its regions by age group and race/skin color: a temporal analysis from 2013 to 2022.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
  7. Did COVID-19 impact perinatal outcomes differently in public and private maternity hospitals in Brazil?Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Tainá Vieira NilsonUniversidade de Brasília. Hospital Universitário de Brasília. Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3173-7008
Angélica Amorim AmatoUniversidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde. Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas. Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8454-5504
Ceres Nunes ResendeUniversidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Medicina. Área de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-3564
Walquíria Quida Salles Pereira PrimoUniversidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Medicina. Área de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3626-1128
Roseli Mieko Yamamoto NomuraUniversidade Federal de São Paulo. Escola Paulista de Medicina. Departamento de Obstetrícia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6471-2125
Maria Laura CostaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Campinas, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8280-3234
Maria Lúcia OppermanUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de Medicina. Unidade de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6578-995X
Marianna BrockUniversidade Federal do Amazonas. Departamento de Obstetrícia e Ginecologia. Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9356-116X
Alberto Trapani JuniorUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Hospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago. Unidade de Saúde da Mulher. Florianópolis, SC, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0196-4488
Lia Cruz Vaz da Costa DamasioUniversidade Federal do Piauí. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Teresina, PI, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-9446
Nadia ReisUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul. Hospital Universitário Maria Aparecida Pedrossian. Unidade de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9028-4574
Vera BorgesUniversidade Estadual Paulista. Escola de Medicina de Botucatu. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-9641
Ana Cristina AraújoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Maternidade Januário Cicco. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Natal, RN, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9802-6492
Rodrigo RuanoMayo Clinic College of Medicine. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Maternal-Fetal Medicine Division. Rochester, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3642-5858
Alberto Carlos Moreno ZaconetaUniversidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Medicina. Área de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6440-4395
Universidade de Brasília · BRMayo Clinic · USUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BRUniversidade Federal do Piauí · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of unplanned pregnancy in eight public university hospitals, distributed in the five regions that make up Brazil.

methodsA secondary analysis of a national multicenter cross-sectional study, carried out in eight public university hospitals between June 1 and August 31, 2020, in Brazil. Convenience sample including women who gave birth within sixty consecutive days and met the following criteria: over 18 years old; gestational age over 36 weeks at delivery; with a single and live newborn, without malformations.

resultsSample composed of 1,120 postpartum women, of whom 756 (67.5%) declared that the pregnancy had not been planned. The median prevalence of unplanned pregnancy was 59.7%. The prevalence of unplanned pregnancy across hospitals differed significantly: Campinas (54.8%), Porto Alegre (58.2%), Florianópolis (59%), Teresina (61.2%), Brasília (64.3%), São Paulo (64.6%), Campo Grande (73.9%) and Manaus (95.3%) (p < 0.001). Factors significantly associated with unplanned pregnancy were maternal age, black color, lower family income, greater number of children, greater number of people living in household, and not having a partner.

conclusionIn the studied sample, about two thirds of the pregnancies were declared as unplanned. The prevalence of unplanned pregnancies was related to social and demographic factors and varied significantly across the university hospitals evaluated.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, UnplannedAdolescentBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancySocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID37377331
PMCPMC10317132
OpenAlexW4382345209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.