Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377224›Full record

ReviewActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Exclusion of pregnant and lactating persons from breast cancer clinical trials: a review of active trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Amy Metcalfe, Nikki Stephenson, Zoe F Cairncross, Natalie V Scime, Miranda Fidler-Benaoudia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Breast cancer during pregnancy-The oncologist's point of view.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
  5. The challenges of cancer during pregnancy.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy MetcalfeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4449-9256
Nikki StephensonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Zoe F CairncrossDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Natalie V ScimeDepartment of Health & Society, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Miranda Fidler-BenaoudiaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institues of Health Research PJT-156294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment of pregnancy-associated breast cancer is complex, as providers try to balance risks to the pregnant person and the developing fetus. Given increased case fatality and increasing incidence, there is a pressing need understand the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens in this population; however, pregnant and lactating people have traditionally been excluded from participating in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Given recent efforts to expand the inclusion criteria for oncology RCTs, this study aimed to review the inclusion/exclusion criteria of current breast cancer RCTs to assess what proportion of trials permitted enrollment of pregnant and lactating persons. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of ClinicalTrials.gov in January 2022 to identify interventional studies of breast cancer in adults that were actively recruiting. The primary outcomes were the exclusion of pregnant and lactating people.

resultsThe search identified 1706 studies, of which 1451 met eligibility criteria. Overall, 69.4% and 54.8% of studies excluded pregnant and lactating people, respectively. The exclusion of pregnant and lactating persons differed by study characteristics but extended across all trial designs, locations, phases and interventions. Exclusion of pregnant and lactating persons was most common in trials where the intervention was biological (86.3%), drug (83.5%) or radiation (81.5%).

conclusionsThe exclusion of pregnant and lactating people from clinical trials contributes to evidence gaps in how to treat this population. A paradigm shift is needed that focuses on how research can be used to protect pregnant people from future harms, instead of protecting pregnant people from research-related risks.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient SelectionAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbreast cancerlactationobstetricspregnancyrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37377224
PMCPMC10993330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.