Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37377101›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of international medical research2023

Effects of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in combination with type II respiratory failure.

Aiming Liu, Yaqing Zhou, Zunguo Pu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of international medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aiming LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hai'an Hospital of Nantong University, Hai'an County, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 226600, China.
Yaqing ZhouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hai'an Hospital of Nantong University, Hai'an County, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 226600, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1887-872X
Zunguo PuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hai'an Hospital of Nantong University, Hai'an County, Nantong City, Jiangsu Province, 226600, China.
Nantong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the therapeutic effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and type II respiratory failure.

methodsSeventy-two patients with AECOPD and type II respiratory failure were randomly allocated to an HFNC oxygen therapy trial group or a non-invasive positive-pressure ventilator therapy (NIPPV) control group. Their arterial blood gas parameters and comfort, evaluated using a questionnaire, were compared before and after the therapeutic interventions.

resultsThe PaCO

conclusionsHFNC has a good therapeutic effect in patients with AECOPD and type II respiratory failure. It improves patient comfort and has clinical value.

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory InsufficiencyCannulaHumansOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyOxygenAcute exacerbationchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasehigh-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapypatient comforttherapeutic effecttype II respiratory failure

Identifiers

PMID37377101
PMCPMC10328027
OpenAlexW4382343703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.