Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37376789›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2023

Outcomes of young adults (aged ≤ 40 years) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after up-front autologous stem cell transplant.

Oren Pasvolsky, Curtis Marcoux, Denái R Milton, Mark R Tanner, Qaiser Bashir, Samer Srour, Neeraj Saini, Paul Lin, Jeremy Ramdial, Yago Nieto and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Oren PasvolskyDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Curtis MarcouxDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Denái R MiltonDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Mark R TannerDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6516-0166
Qaiser BashirDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-6453
Samer SrourDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Neeraj SainiDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Paul LinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jeremy RamdialDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8984-3420
Yago NietoDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6034-8939
Hans C LeeDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8545-3292
Krina K PatelDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Partow KebriaeiDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Priti TewariDepartment of Pediatrics Patient Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lindsay Crawford-SuberDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sheeba K ThomasDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Donna M WeberDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Robert Z OrlowskiDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5723-4129
Elizabeth J ShpallDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Richard E ChamplinDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Muzaffar H QazilbashDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2876-2886
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) primarily affects older patients. There are scarce data on the outcomes of young adults undergoing autologous transplantation (auto-HCT). In this single-centre analysis, we included 117 younger patients, with a median age of 37 years (range 22-40) at transplant. Seventeen (15%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics. Before transplant, 10% of patients achieved ≥CR and 44% achieved ≥VGPR. At best post-transplant response, 56% and 77% of patients achieved ≥CR and ≥VGPR respectively. With a median follow-up for survivors of 72.6 months (range 0.9-238.0), median PFS and OS were 43.1 months (95% CI 31.2-65.0) and 146.6 months (95% CI 100.0-208.1) respectively. Patients who underwent auto-HCT after 2010 had better median PFS (84.9 months vs. 28.2 months, p < 0.001) and OS (NR vs. 91.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with those transplanted earlier. In multi-variate analysis, achieving ≥CR as best post-transplant response was associated with improved PFS (HR [95% CI] 0.55 [0.32-0.95], p = 0.032), while achieving ≥VGPR was predictive of superior OS (0.32 [0.16-0.62], p < 0.001). Three patients (3%) developed a second primary malignancy. Younger MM patients had durable survival after auto-HCT, which further improved after the availability of novel anti-myeloma drugs in recent years. Depth of response following transplant remains a key predictor of survival.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple MyelomaAdultHumansPrognosisRetrospective StudiesStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, AutologousTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultautologousmultiple myelomatransplantationyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID37376789
PMCPMC10527395
OpenAlexW4382343839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.