Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37376651›Full record

ArticleViruses2023

Novel Approach for Identification of Basic and Effective Reproduction Numbers Illustrated with COVID-19.

Tchavdar T Marinov, Rossitza S Marinova, Radoslav T Marinov, Nicci Shelby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tchavdar T MarinovDepartment of Natural Sciences, Southern University at New Orleans, 6801 Press Drive, New Orleans, LA 70126, USA.
Rossitza S MarinovaDepartment of Mathematical & Physical Sciences, Concordia University of Edmonton, 7128 Ada Boulevard, Edmonton, AB T5B 4E4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7911-5086
Radoslav T MarinovRescale, 33 New Montgomery Street, Suite 950, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
Nicci ShelbyDepartment of Natural Sciences, Southern University at New Orleans, 6801 Press Drive, New Orleans, LA 70126, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a novel numerical technique for the identification of effective and basic reproduction numbers, Re and R0, for long-term epidemics, using an inverse problem approach. The method is based on the direct integration of the SIR (Susceptible-Infectious-Removed) system of ordinary differential equations and the least-squares method. Simulations were conducted using official COVID-19 data for the United States and Canada, and for the states of Georgia, Texas, and Louisiana, for a period of two years and ten months. The results demonstrate the applicability of the method in simulating the dynamics of the epidemic and reveal an interesting relationship between the number of currently infectious individuals and the effective reproduction number, which is a useful tool for predicting the epidemic dynamics. For all conducted experiments, the results show that the local maximum (and minimum) values of the time-dependent effective reproduction number occur approximately three weeks before the local maximum (and minimum) values of the number of currently infectious individuals. This work provides a novel and efficient approach for the identification of time-dependent epidemics parameters.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19EpidemicsBasic Reproduction NumberDisease SusceptibilityHumansdata miningepidemic dynamicsinfection and recovery ratesinfectious disease modelinginverse problemreproduction numbersSIR modeltime-dependent parameters

Identifiers

PMID37376651
PMCPMC10302437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.