ArticlePolymers2023
Adsorption Characterization of Cu(II) and Cd(II) by a Magnetite-Chitosan Composite: Kinetic, Thermodynamic and Equilibrium Studies.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental and DFT Study of the Monocomponent and Binary Adsorption of Heavy Metals in Chitosan Hydrogels at Different Temperatures.Polymers · 2026Article
- Thioctic acid-based adsorbent for heavy metal removal (CdRSC advances · 2026Article
- Different Magnetization Levels of Magnetite-Chitosan Nanocomposites for Co (II) Adsorption from Natural Waters.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quinoline-functionalized graphene oxide for enhanced cadmium removal: synthesis, characterization, and mechanistic insights.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Green synthesis of gum Arabic-activated magnetite-nickel nanoparticles for selective removal of Cd(ii) and Cu(ii) from complex aqueous systems.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Use of Chitosan-Iron Oxide Gels for the Removal of CdGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Optimizing the use of magnetite-chitosan composites for heavy metal adsorption has been of great interest due to their environmental friendliness. To gain insights into their potential with green synthesis, this study analyzed one of these composites through X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Adsorption properties were then explored via static experiments to evaluate the pH dependence, isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamics and regeneration adsorption of Cu(II) and Cd(II). Results disclosed that the optimum pH of adsorption was 5.0, the equilibrium time was about 10 min, and the capacity for Cu(II) and Cd(II) reached 26.28 and 18.67 mg/g, respectively. The adsorption amount of cations increased with temperature from 25 °C to 35 °C and decreased with further increase in temperature from 40 °C to 50 °C, which might be related to the unfolding of chitosan; the adsorption capacity was above 80% of the initial value after two regenerations and about 60% after five regenerations. The composite has a relatively rough outer surface, but its inner surface and porosity are not obvious; it has functional groups of magnetite and chitosan, and chitosan might dominate the adsorption. Consequently, this research proposes the value of maintaining green synthesis research to further optimize the composite system of heavy metal adsorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.