Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Irene Gómez-de la CruzLaboratorio de Biotecnología Microbiana, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomas, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo 11340, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Belén Chávez-RamírezLaboratorio de Fitopatología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomas, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo 11340, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Carlos Hugo Avendaño-ArrazateCampo Experimental Rosario Izapa, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Km 18, Carretera Tapachula-Cacahoatán, Tuxtla Chico 30870, Chiapas, Mexico.
Yolanda Elizabeth Morales-GarcíaEcology and Survival of Microoganisms Gropu, Laboratorio de Ecología Microbiana, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, San Manuel, Puebla 72570, Puebla, Mexico.
Jesús Muñoz-RojasEcology and Survival of Microoganisms Gropu, Laboratorio de Ecología Microbiana, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, San Manuel, Puebla 72570, Puebla, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1151-9778
Paulina Estrada-de Los SantosLaboratorio de Biotecnología Microbiana, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prolongación Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n, Col. Santo Tomas, Alcaldía Miguel Hidalgo 11340, Ciudad de México, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2407-0284
Instituto Politécnico Nacional · MXBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla · MXInstituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias · MX
Funding
Instituto Politécnico Nacional 2019-6819, 2020-0918, 2021-2080, 2022-1121Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food 2017-2-291417
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
In Mexico, cacao production is endangered by pathogenic fungi, such as
Indexed as
biocontrolblack pod rotmoniliasisMoniliophthora roreriPhytophthoraTheobroma cacao
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.