Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37375941›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Performance Analysis of Time Series Deep Learning Models for Climate Prediction in Indoor Hydroponic Greenhouses at Different Time Intervals.

Oybek Eraliev, Chul-Hee Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oybek EralievDepartment of Future Vehicle Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Mitchuholgu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1248-428X
Chul-Hee LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University, 100 Inharo, Mitchuholgu, Incheon 22212, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1095-3713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor hydroponic greenhouses are becoming increasingly popular for sustainable food production. On the other hand, precise control of the climate conditions inside these greenhouses is crucial for the success of the crops. Time series deep learning models are adequate for climate predictions in indoor hydroponic greenhouses, but a comparative analysis of these models at different time intervals is needed. This study evaluated the performance of three commonly used deep learning models for climate prediction in an indoor hydroponic greenhouse: Deep Neural Network, Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), and 1D Convolutional Neural Network. The performance of these models was compared at four time intervals (1, 5, 10, and 15 min) using a dataset collected over a week at one-minute intervals. The experimental results showed that all three models perform well in predicting the temperature, humidity, and CO

Indexed as

climate predictionconvolutional neural networkdeep neural networkhydroponic greenhouselong–short-term memorytime series

Identifiers

PMID37375941
PMCPMC10304734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.