ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Effectiveness of Pharmacokinetic-Guided Hydroxyurea Dose Individualization in Patients with Sickle Cell Anemia: A Mini-Review.
Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydroxyurea pharmacokinetics in children with sickle cell anemia across different global populations.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Hydroxyurea Pharmacokinetic Evaluation in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Drug Selection and Posology, Optimal Therapies and Risk/Benefit Assessment in Medicine: The Paradigm of Iron-Chelating Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Inconsistent therapeutic responses have been observed among patients with sickle cell anemia (SCA) undergoing hydroxyurea (HU) following the adoption of the standardized protocol. Moreover, this treatment regimen necessitates a prolonged period to reach the maximum tolerated dose in which beneficial therapeutic effects are observed in most SCA patients. To overcome this limitation, several studies have performed HU dose adjustments in SCA patients based on individualized pharmacokinetic profiles. The present systematic mini-review aims to select and analyze published data to present an overview of HU pharmacokinetics studies performed in SCA patients, as well as evaluate the effectiveness of the dose adjustment strategy. A systematic search was performed in the Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, Google Scholar, and the Virtual Library of Health databases from December 2020 to August 2022, with a total of five studies included. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies in which the dose adjustment was performed in SCA patients based on pharmacokinetic parameters. Quality analyzes were performed using QAT, while data synthesis was performed according to the Cochrane Manual of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Analysis of the selected studies revealed improved HU treatment effectiveness using personalized dosages in SCA patients. Moreover, several laboratory parameters were utilized as biomarkers of the HU response, and methods designed to simplify the adoption of this practice were presented. Despite the scarcity of studies on this topic, HU-personalized treatment based on individualized pharmacokinetic profiles represents a viable alternative for SCA patients who are candidates for HU therapy, especially for pediatric patients. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD42022344512.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.