Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37375655›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Long-Tailed Food Classification.

Jiangpeng He, Luotao Lin, Heather A Eicher-Miller, Fengqing Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiangpeng HeElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8552-9880
Luotao LinDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4817-2392
Heather A Eicher-MillerDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1261-4291
Fengqing ZhuElmore Family School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3863-3220

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food classification serves as the basic step of image-based dietary assessment to predict the types of foods in each input image. However, foods in real-world scenarios are typically long-tail distributed, where a small number of food types are consumed more frequently than others, which causes a severe class imbalance issue and hinders the overall performance. In addition, none of the existing long-tailed classification methods focus on food data, which can be more challenging due to the inter-class similarity and intra-class diversity between food images. In this work, two new benchmark datasets for long-tailed food classification are introduced, including Food101-LT and VFN-LT, where the number of samples in VFN-LT exhibits real-world long-tailed food distribution. Then, a novel two-phase framework is proposed to address the problem of class imbalance by (1) undersampling the head classes to remove redundant samples along with maintaining the learned information through knowledge distillation and (2) oversampling the tail classes by performing visually aware data augmentation. By comparing our method with existing state-of-the-art long-tailed classification methods, we show the effectiveness of the proposed framework, which obtains the best performance on both Food101-LT and VFN-LT datasets. The results demonstrate the potential to apply the proposed method to related real-life applications.

Indexed as

Foodbenchmark datasetsfood classificationfood consumption frequencyimage-based dietary assessmentlong-tail distributionneural networks

Identifiers

PMID37375655
PMCPMC10304484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.