Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37375570›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

Therapeutic Fasting in Reducing Chemotherapy Side Effects in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yvelise Ferro, Samantha Maurotti, Maria Grazia Tarsitano, Oscar Lodari, Roberta Pujia, Elisa Mazza, Lidia Lascala, Raffaella Russo, Arturo Pujia, Tiziana Montalcini

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of intermittent fasting on patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies: a systematic review of the literature.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yvelise FerroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7503-6188
Samantha MaurottiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7644-1337
Maria Grazia TarsitanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Oscar LodariDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Roberta PujiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Elisa MazzaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3198-7090
Lidia LascalaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Raffaella RussoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Arturo PujiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Science, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
Tiziana MontalciniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Magna Grecia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-5830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the available evidence regarding the effect of a variety of fasting-like regimens on preventing chemotherapy-related side effects. PubMed, Scopus and Embase were used to select the studies for this review, which concluded on 24 November 2022. All types of clinical trials and case series reporting chemotherapy toxicity associated with fasting regimens and any comparison were considered. A total of 283 records were identified, of which 274 were excluded, leaving only nine studies that met the inclusion criteria. Five of these trials were randomized. Overall, moderate to high-quality evidence showed that several fasting regimens did not provide benefits compared to a conventional diet or other comparators in reducing the risk of adverse events. The overall pooled estimate for a variety of fasting regime when compared to non-fasting, indicated no significant difference in the side effects (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.77-1.59;

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumanschemotherapychemotherapy toxicityfastingintermittent fastingtime-restricted eating

Identifiers

PMID37375570
PMCPMC10303481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.