Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37375265›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effect of Plant Fiber on Early Properties of Geopolymer.

Chun Lv, Dan Wu, Guoliang Guo, Yanming Zhang, Shuang Liu, Enxiang Qu, Jie Liu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chun LvCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China.
Dan WuCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China.
Guoliang GuoCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China.
Yanming ZhangCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China.
Shuang LiuCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China.
Enxiang QuCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5934-8253
Jie LiuCollege of Light-Industry and Textile Engineering, Qiqihar University, Qiqihar 161006, China.

Funding

General items of basic scientific research business expenses of provincial universities in Heilongjiang Province 145109126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geopolymer (GP) is environmentally friendly, has good mechanical properties and long-term workability, and has broad application prospects. However, due to the poor tensile strength and toughness of GPs, they are sensitive to microcracks, which limits their application in engineering. Fiber can be added to GPs to limit the growth of cracks and enhance the toughness of the GP. Plant fiber (PF) is cheap, easy to obtain, and abundant in source, which can be added to GP to improve the properties of composites. This paper reviews recent studies on the early properties of plant fiber-reinforced geopolymers (PFRGs). In this manuscript, the properties of PFs commonly used for GP reinforcements are summarized. The early properties of PFRGs were reviewed, including the rheological properties of fresh GPs, the early strength of PFRGs, and the early shrinkage and deformation properties of PFRGs. At the same time, the action mechanism and influencing factors of PFRGs are also introduced. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the early properties of PFRGs, the adverse effects of PFs on the early properties of GPs and the solutions were summarized.

Indexed as

early propertygeopolymerplant fiberworkability

Identifiers

PMID37375265
PMCPMC10303951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.