ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Antibody and Nanobody Radiolabeling with Copper-64: Solid vs. Liquid Target Approach.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Improved extraction efficiency of radioactive copper produced via accelerator neutrons method through phosphate buffer-enhanced column pre-treatment.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Neurotensin (8-13) and Neuromedin N Neuropeptides Radiolabelling with Copper-64 Produced on Solid or Liquid Targets.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Antibody and nanobody-based copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals are increasingly being proposed as theranostic tools in multiple human diseases. While the production of copper-64 using solid targets has been established for many years, its use is limited due to the complexity of solid target systems, which are available in only a few cyclotrons worldwide. In contrast, liquid targets, available in virtually in all cyclotrons, constitute a practical and reliable alternative. In this study, we discuss the production, purification, and radiolabeling of antibodies and nanobodies using copper-64 obtained from both solid and liquid targets. Copper-64 production from solid targets was performed on a TR-19 cyclotron with an energy of 11.7 MeV, while liquid target production was obtained by bombarding a nickel-64 solution using an IBA Cyclone Kiube cyclotron with 16.9 MeV on target. Copper-64 was purified from both solid and liquid targets and used to radiolabel NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-Trastuzumab conjugates. Stability studies were conducted on all radioimmunoconjugates in mouse serum, PBS, and DTPA. Irradiation of the solid target yielded 13.5 ± 0.5 GBq with a beam current of 25 ± 1.2 μA and an irradiation time of 6 h. On the other hand, irradiation of the liquid target resulted in 2.8 ± 1.3 GBq at the end of bombardment (EOB) with a beam current of 54.5 ± 7.8 μA and an irradiation time of 4.1 ± 1.3 h. Successful radiolabeling of NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-Trastuzumab with copper-64 from both solid and liquid targets was achieved. Specific activities (SA) obtained with the solid target were 0.11, 0.19, and 0.33 MBq/μg for NODAGA-Nb, NOTA-Nb, and DOTA-trastuzumab, respectively. For the liquid target, the corresponding SA values were 0.15, 0.12, and 0.30 MBq/μg. Furthermore, all three radiopharmaceuticals demonstrated stability under the testing conditions. While solid targets have the potential to produce significantly higher activity in a single run, the liquid process offers advantages such as speed, ease of automation, and the feasibility of back-to-back production using a medical cyclotron. In this study, successful radiolabeling of antibodies and nanobodies was achieved using both solid and liquid targets approaches. The radiolabeled compounds exhibited high radiochemical purity and specific activity, rendering them suitable for subsequent in vivo pre-clinical imaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.