Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37374757›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2023

PreOBP_ML: Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Optical Biosensor Parameters.

Kawsar Ahmed, Francis M Bui, Fang-Xiang Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kawsar AhmedDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4034-9819
Francis M BuiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8799-5965
Fang-Xiang WuDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Computer Science and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4593-9332

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop standard optical biosensors, the simulation procedure takes a lot of time. For reducing that enormous amount of time and effort, machine learning might be a better solution. Effective indices, core power, total power, and effective area are the most crucial parameters for evaluating optical sensors. In this study, several machine learning (ML) approaches have been applied to predict those parameters while considering the core radius, cladding radius, pitch, analyte, and wavelength as the input vectors. We have utilized least squares (LS), LASSO, Elastic-Net (ENet), and Bayesian ridge regression (BRR) to make a comparative discussion using a balanced dataset obtained with the COMSOL Multiphysics simulation tool. Furthermore, a more extensive analysis of sensitivity, power fraction, and confinement loss is also demonstrated using the predicted and simulated data. The suggested models were also examined in terms of R2-score, mean average error (MAE), and mean squared error (MSE), with all of the models having an R2-score of more than 0.99, and it was also shown that optical biosensors had a design error rate of less than 3%. This research might pave the way for machine learning-based optimization approaches to be used to improve optical biosensors.

Indexed as

machine learningoptical sensorparameter estimationsperformanceprediction

Identifiers

PMID37374757
PMCPMC10302917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.