ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Mechanical Behavior and Crack Evolution of Goaf Surrounding Rock with Different Roof-Contacted Filling Rates.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research on acoustic emission characteristics and mechanical properties of shale under uniaxial and conventional triaxial compression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Stability assessment of surrounding rock in downward mining route supported by slab-wall backfill structure.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goaf formed by mining is filled and treated, which greatly improves the safety and stability of the surrounding rock. During the filling process, the roof-contacted filling rates (RCFR) of goaf were closely related to the stability control of the surrounding rock. The influence of the roof-contacted filling rate on the mechanical characteristics and crack propagation of the goaf surrounding rock (GSR) has been studied. Biaxial compression experiments and numerical simulation experiments were conducted on samples under different operating conditions. The results were as follows: (1) The peak stress, peak strain, and elastic modulus of the GSR are closely related to the RCFR and the goaf size; they increase with the increase of the RCFR, and decrease with the increase of the goaf size; (2) In the initial loading stage, a small number of cracks are generated, and the acoustic emission ringing count increases slowly. The mid-loading stage is the crack initiation and rapid expansion, and the cumulative ring count curve shows a "stepwise" growth. In the later loading stage, cracks continue to propagate and form macroscopic fractures, but the number of rings significantly decreases; (3) Shear cracks are prone to occur in the rock part of the GSR; tensile cracks are prone to occur in the backfill; and the crack propagation speed in the rock is faster than in the backfill. Stress concentration is the direct cause of GSR failure. The maximum concentrated stress of rock mass and backfill is 1~2.5 times and 0.17~0.7 times of the peak stress of the GSR, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.