ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Computational Analysis of Sandwich Panels with Graded Foam Cores Subjected to Combined Blast and Fragment Impact Loading.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tailoring combined impact loading using gradient foam composite projectiles with variable fragment shapes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Blast Resistance of Confined Multilayer Graded Corrugated-Core Sandwich Cylindrical Shells.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of sandwich panels with graded foam cores of layered densities against combined blast and fragment impact loading, and to ascertain the optimal gradient of core configuration that would maximize the performance of sandwich panels against combined loading. First, based on a recently developed composite projectile, impact tests of the sandwich panels against simulated combined loading were conducted to provide a benchmark for the computational model. Second, a computational model, based on three-dimensional finite element simulation, was constructed and verified by means of a comparison of the numerically calculated and experimentally measured peak deflections of the back facesheet and the residual velocity of the penetrated fragment. Third, the structural response and energy absorption characteristics were examined, based on numerical simulations. Finally, the optimal gradient of core configuration was explored and numerically examined. The results indicated that the sandwich panel responded in a combined manner involving global deflection, local perforation and perforation hole enlargement. As the impact velocity increased, both the peak deflection of the back facesheet and the residual velocity of the penetrated fragment increased. The front facesheet was found to be the most important sandwich component in consuming the kinetic energy of the combined loading. Thus, the compaction of the foam core would be facilitated by placing the low-density foam at the front side. This would further provide a larger deflecting space for the front facesheet, thus reducing the deflection of the back facesheet. The gradient of core configuration was found to have limited influence on the anti-perforation ability of the sandwich panel. Parametric study indicated that the optimal gradient of foam core configuration was not sensitive to time delay between blast loading and fragment impact loading, but was sensitive to the asymmetrical facesheet of the sandwich panel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.