ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions: A Triumph for Transcatheter Procedures?
Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Valvular Heart Disease in Non-Valvular Heart Failure Continuum: The Role of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions to Manage Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Patient Phenotypes Undergoing Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Finding the Optimal Candidate.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Cardioband in Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Single-Arm Trials and Observational Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Impact of Leaflet-to-Annulus Index on Residual Regurgitation Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Tricuspid Valve.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Application of Precision Medicine in Structural Heart Diseases: A Step towards the Future.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Transcatheter Management of Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Review of Contemporary Evidence.Heart international · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common valvular pathology, estimated to affect 1.6 million people in the United States alone. Even though guidelines recommend either medical therapy or surgical treatment for TR, the misconception of TR as a benign disease along with the high mortality rates of surgical intervention led to undertreating this disease and commonly describing it as a "forgotten" valve. Recently, the development of transcatheter interventions for TR show promising potential for use in the clinical setting. There are currently few approved and numerous tested percutaneously delivered devices, which can be categorized, based on their mechanism of action, to either valve repair or valve replacement procedures. Both procedures were tested in clinical trials and show an echocardiographic reduction in TR sustained for at least 1 year after the procedure, as well as symptom relief and functional improvement of the patients. Device selection should be personalized, taking into consideration the anatomy of each valve and the available options at each heart center. Moreover, appropriate patient selection and timing of the procedure are also crucial for the success of the procedure. In this review, we analyze the clinical trials available for all devices currently approved or tested, aiming to provide a comprehensive summary of the most recent evidence in the field of transcatheter TR interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.