Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37374162›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Current Research on the Use of the Omental Flap in Breast Reconstruction and Post-Mastectomy Lymphedema: A Focus on Omental-Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer.

Farrah C Liu, Kometh Thawanyarat, Yelissa Navarro, Dung H Nguyen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Farrah C LiuDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.
Kometh ThawanyaratMedical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2971-8879
Yelissa NavarroMedical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Dung H NguyenDivision of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9494-7523
Augusta University · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel use of the omental flap in breast reconstruction has been increasing in research popularity within the last few decades. This technique has its roots in the early 20th century as surgeons explored the use of the omentum for a variety of reconstructive purposes across various surgical subspecialties. The current literature shows evidence of the benefits of using the omentum in autologous breast reconstruction compared to the more traditional abdominal, flank, thigh, and gluteal donor flap reconstruction. This method introduces a viable option for patients that do not meet the criteria for the traditional autologous reconstruction techniques allowing for the restoration of more natural appearing breasts without the added complication of donor-site mortality. Additionally, the omentum, with its rich source of vascularized lymph nodes, has been studied as a potential source for lymph node transfer in the treatment of mastectomy-associated lymphedema. In this review, we highlight the most recent research on the current practices of omental-based breast reconstruction techniques and their use in postmastectomy lymphedema. We discuss the history and natural progression of the development of omental-based reconstruction as an autologous breast reconstruction technique, highlight the latest advances and challenges for the utility of the omental flap in current surgical procedures, and present future directions for the potential role of omental-based breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast surgery.

Indexed as

breastlymphedemaomental flap transferomentumplastic surgeryreconstruction

Identifiers

PMID37374162
PMCPMC10305136
OpenAlexW4380685627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.