Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37374069›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Immunomodulatory Effects of Natural Feed Additives for Meat Chickens.

Clive J C Phillips, Babak Hosseintabar-Ghasemabad, Ivan F Gorlov, Marina I Slozhenkina, Aleksandr A Mosolov, Alireza Seidavi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  13. Effects of Different Levels ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Effect of dietary supplementation withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Clive J C PhillipsInstitute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1, 51014 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-6357
Babak Hosseintabar-GhasemabadDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5166616471, Iran.
Ivan F GorlovVolga Region Research Institute of Manufacture and Processing of Meat and Milk Production, 400131 Volgograd, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8683-8159
Marina I SlozhenkinaVolga Region Research Institute of Manufacture and Processing of Meat and Milk Production, 400131 Volgograd, Russia.
Aleksandr A MosolovVolga Region Research Institute of Manufacture and Processing of Meat and Milk Production, 400131 Volgograd, Russia.
Alireza SeidaviDepartment of Animal Science, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht 41335-3516, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1903-2753
Povolzhsky Research Institute of Production and Processing of Meat and Dairy Products · RUEstonian University of Life Sciences · EEIslamic Azad University Rasht Branch · IRUniversity of Tabriz · IR

Funding

Islamic Azad University, Arak 17.16.1.575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broiler chickens are increasingly kept in large numbers in intensive housing conditions that are stressful, potentially depleting the immune system. With the prohibition of the use of antibiotics in poultry feed spreading worldwide, it is necessary to consider the role of natural feed additives and antibiotic alternatives to stimulate the chickens' immune systems. We review the literature to describe phytogenic feed additives that have immunomodulatory benefits in broilers. We initially review the major active ingredients from plants, particularly flavonoids, resveratrol and humic acid, and then describe the major herbs, spices, and other plants and their byproducts that have immunomodulatory effects. The research reviewed demonstrates the effectiveness of many natural feed additives in improving the avian immune system and therefore broiler health. However, some, and perhaps all, additives have the potential to reduce immunocompetence if given in excessive amounts. Sometimes additives are more effective when given in combination. There is an urgent need to determine tolerance levels and optimum doses for additives deemed most suitable to replace antibiotics in the diet of broiler chickens. Effective replacement is most likely with readily available additives, such as olive oil byproducts, olive leaves and alfalfa. It is concluded that effective replacement of antibiotic function with plant-derived additives will be possible, but that further research is necessary to determine optimum doses.

Indexed as

antibiotic alternativebroilersimmune systemnatural feed additivepoultry

Identifiers

PMID37374069
PMCPMC10301336
OpenAlexW4378908878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.