Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37374020›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effects of Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) Supplementation on Ovarian Cumulus Cells following In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)/Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) Treatment-A Systematic Review.

Woon Shu Yuan, Muhammad Azrai Abu, Mohd Faizal Ahmad, Marjanu Hikmah Elias, Abdul Kadir Abdul Karim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Woon Shu YuanAdvanced Reproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Muhammad Azrai AbuAdvanced Reproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-572X
Mohd Faizal AhmadAdvanced Reproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
Marjanu Hikmah EliasFaculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Bandar Baru Nilai 71800, Malaysia.
Abdul Kadir Abdul KarimAdvanced Reproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia.
University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre · MYUniversiti Sains Islam Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite many studies exploring the effects of DHEA supplementation, its application in IVF procedure continues to be a subject of debate owing to the inconsistent findings and the lack of rigorously designed, large-scale, randomized trials. Our review aims to explore the effectiveness of DHEA supplementation in ovarian cumulus cells following IVF/ICSI treatment. We conducted a literature search of Pub-Med, Ovid MEDLINE, and SCOPUS (inception to June 2022) for all relevant articles, including the keywords of "dehydroepiandrosterone/DHEA", "oocyte", and "cumulus cells". From the preliminary search, 69 publications were identified, and following a thorough screening process, seven studies were ultimately incorporated into the final review. Four hundred twenty-four women were enrolled in these studies, with DHEA supplementation being administered exclusively to women exhibiting poor ovarian response/diminished ovarian reserve or belonging to an older age demographic. The intervention in the studies was DHEA 75-90 mg daily for at least 8-12 weeks. The only randomized controlled trial showed no difference in clinical or cumulus cell-related outcomes between the control and treatment groups. However, the remaining six studies (two cohorts, four case-controls) showed significant beneficial effects of DHEA in cumulus cell-related outcomes compared to the group (older age or POR/DOR) without DHEA supplementation. All studies revealed no significant difference in stimulation and pregnancy outcomes. Our review concludes that DHEA supplementation did show beneficial effect on ovarian cumulus cells in improving oocyte quality for women of advanced age or with poor ovarian responders.

Indexed as

cumulus cellsDehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)in vitro fertilizationoocyte qualityovarian function

Identifiers

PMID37374020
PMCPMC10304479
OpenAlexW4378229176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.