ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023
Positive Prediction Value of Retinal Artery Occlusion Diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: A Validation Study.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cumulative incidence of macular edema in non-infectious uveitis indicates an early therapeutic window.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic factors and the risk of eye diseases in an elderly Danish population.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2025Article
- Impact of socioeconomic factors on cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and all-cause mortality in patients with uveitis: a Danish cohort study.BMJ public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe hospital registration of retinal artery occlusions in the Danish National Patient Registry has not previously been validated. In this study, the diagnosis codes were validated to ensure the diagnoses had an acceptable validity for research. The validation was performed both for the overall diagnosis population and at the subtype diagnosis level.
methodsThe medical records for all patients with retinal artery occlusion with an incident hospital record in the years 2017-2019 in Northern Jutland (Denmark) were assessed in this population-based validation study. Furthermore, fundus images and two-person verification were assessed for the included patients when available. The positive prediction values for the overall diagnosis of retinal artery occlusion, as well as for the central or branch subtypes, were calculated.
resultsA total of 102 medical records were available for review. The overall positive prediction value for a retinal artery occlusion diagnosis was 79.4% (95% CI: 70.6-86.1%), while the overall positive prediction value at the subtype diagnosis level was 69.6% (95% CI: 60.1-77.7%), with 73.3% (95% CI: 58.1-85.4%) for branch retinal artery occlusion and 71.2% (95% CI: 56.9-82.9%) for central retinal artery occlusion. For the stratified analyses at the subtype diagnosis, age, sex, diagnosis year, and primary or secondary diagnosis, the positive prediction values ranged from 73.5 to 91.7%. In the stratified analyses at the subtype level, the positive prediction values ranged from 63.3 to 83.3%. The differences among the positive prediction values of the individual strata of both analyses were not statistically significant.
conclusionsthe validities of the retinal artery occlusion and subtype level diagnoses are comparable to other validated diagnoses and considered acceptable for use in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.