Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373867›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Patient Perceptions of Paramedian Minimally Invasive Spine Skin Incisions.

Kimberly Quiring, Morgan P Lorio, Jorge Felipe Ramírez León, Paulo Sérgio Teixeira de Carvalho, Rossano Kepler Alvim Fiorelli, Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kimberly Quiring3700 E. Williams Field Rd., Gilbert, AZ 85295, USA.
Morgan P LorioAdvanced Orthopedics, 499 E. Central Pkwy, Ste. 130, Altamonte Springs, FL 32701, USA.
Jorge Felipe Ramírez LeónMinimally Invasive Spine Center, Reina Sofía Clinic, Bogotá 104-76, Colombia.
Paulo Sérgio Teixeira de CarvalhoPain and Spine Minimally Invasive Surgery Service, Gaffre e Guinle University Hospital, Rio de Janeiro 20270-004, RJ, Brazil.
Rossano Kepler Alvim FiorelliDepartment of General and Specialized Surgery, Gaffrée e Guinle University Hospital, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro 20270-004, RJ, Brazil.
Kai-Uwe LewandrowskiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá 104-76, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7842-2914
Hospital Universitário Gaffrée e Guinle · BRFundación Universitaria Sanitas · COUniversidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRWilliams & Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical outcome studies, patient input into the factors that drive higher satisfaction with lumbar minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) is rare. The skin incision is often the only visible consequence of surgery that patients can assess. The authors were interested in patients' opinions about the type of lumbar paramedian minimally invasive spinal (MIS) skin incision employed during MISS and how novel skin incisions could impact patients' interpretation of the outcome. The authors wanted to compare traditional lumbar stab incisions to three novel lumbar paramedian (MIS) skin incisions to determine if further study is indicated. The primary objective was to examine patient satisfaction and perceptions regarding lumbar paramedian MIS skin incisions.

methodsWe reviewed the literature and conducted a patient opinion survey. Responses were solicited from back pain patients from a single chiropractic office. Survey questions regarding novel skin incisions for minimally invasive spine surgery (NSIMISS) were conceptualized. The three novel skin incisions were designed using Langer's lines to reduce the total number of incisions; improve patient satisfaction; increase ease of surgical approach/fixation; and reduce operative time/radiation exposure.

resultsOne hundred and six participants were surveyed. When shown traditional lumbar paramedian MIS skin stab incisions, 76% of respondents indicated negative responses,

conclusionsPatients do have opinions on the type of lumbar paramedian MIS skin incision used. It appears that younger patients and female patients worry most about how the incision on their back looks after surgery. A larger population of patients across many demographics is needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

horizontallarger intersectingnovel mini obliqueparamedian minimally invasive lumbar spine skin incisionspatient satisfactionvertical

Identifiers

PMID37373867
PMCPMC10305384
OpenAlexW4378086439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.