Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373826›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Effects of Electrical Stimulation on Facial Paralysis Recovery after Facial Nerve Injury: A Review on Preclinical and Clinical Studies.

Myung Chul Yoo, Jeong Hee Kim, Yong Jun Kim, Junyang Jung, Sung Soo Kim, Sang Hoon Kim, Seung Geun Yeo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Manual Lymph Drainage Vodder (MLDV) Increases Facial Function in Bell's Palsy Patients.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Myung Chul YooDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2088-9612
Jeong Hee KimDepartment of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.
Yong Jun KimDepartment of Biomedical Science, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-712X
Junyang JungDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3946-5406
Sung Soo KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.
Sang Hoon KimDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5045-5060
Seung Geun YeoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8021-1024
Kyung Hee University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various methods have been used to improve function and manage facial nerve injury. Although electrical stimulation therapy is frequently used to treat facial paralysis, its effects have been found to vary and no clear standards have been developed. The current review describes the results of preclinical and clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of electrical stimulation therapy in promoting the recovery of a peripheral facial nerve injury. Evidence is presented showing the efficacy of electrical stimulation in promoting nerve regeneration after peripheral nerve injuries in both animal models and human patients. The ability of electrical stimulation to promote the recovery of facial paralysis was found to depend on the type of injury (compression or transection), the species of animal tested, the type of disease, the frequency and method of electrical stimulation, and the duration of the follow-up. Electrical stimulation, however, can also have potential negative outcomes, such as reinforcing synkinesis, including mistargeted axonal regrowth via inappropriate routes; excessive collateral axonal branching at the lesion site; and multiple innervations at neuromuscular junctions. Because of the inconsistencies among studies and the low quality of evidence, electrical stimulation therapy is not currently regarded as a primary treatment of facial paralysis in patients. However, understanding the effects of electrical stimulation, as determined in preclinical and clinical studies, is important for the potential validity of future research on electrical stimulation.

Indexed as

electrical stimulationfacial nerverecoveryregeneration

Identifiers

PMID37373826
PMCPMC10299525
OpenAlexW4381336286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.