ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections as Prophylaxis for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection in Women.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global trends in platelet-rich plasma research: A bibliometric review with hotspot visualization.Medicine · 2026Review
- Platelet-rich therapies in cutaneous and mucocutaneous disorders characterized by inflammatory tissue responses: mechanistic insights and clinical evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Application of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Gynaecologic Disorders: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Effects of electroacupuncture on chronic urinary retention after pelvic or lumbosacral tumor resection surgeries: a retrospective cohort study.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Pathophysiology and potential treatment modalities in women with recurrent urinary tract infection.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the therapeutic efficacy of intravesical platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections as prophylaxis for adult women with recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI).
methodsThis proof-of-concept study enrolled 63 women with rUTI in PRP treatment and control groups after achieving control of the most recent urinary tract infection (UTI) episode. The treatment group included 34 women who received 4 monthly intravesical PRP injections. The control group was made up of 30 women who received continuous antibiotic treatment for 3 months. After the completion of PRP or antibiotic treatment, outpatient follow-up was continued for up to 12 months. Treatment was considered successful if ≤2 UTI episodes occurred during a period of 12 months or ≤1 UTI episode within 6 months; otherwise, the outcome was considered a treatment failure. The frequency of symptomatic UTI episodes before and after PRP treatment was compared with that of the controls. Regression analysis was used to determine the association between potential predictors for a failed treatment outcome.
resultsAt the study endpoint, 33 PRP and 25 control group patients were available for analysis. After four PRP injections, the frequency of rUTI episodes per month was significantly decreased compared with baseline (0.46 ± 0.27 vs. 0.28 ± 0.30,
conclusionsThe study results revealed that repeat intravesical PRP injections decreased the recurrence rate of UTI within 1 year in women with rUTI. The treatment success rate with intravesical PRP injections for rUTI was about 51.5%, whereas for women with prolonged antibiotic treatment, it was 48.0%. A baseline VE ≥ 0.71 was associated with a better treatment outcome with PRP injections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.