Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373766›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Etiology, Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Management. Fresh Look into a Full Box.

Akbayan Turesheva, Gulzhanat Aimagambetova, Talshyn Ukybassova, Aizada Marat, Perizat Kanabekova, Lyazzat Kaldygulova, Ainur Amanzholkyzy, Svetlana Ryzhkova, Anastassiya Nogay, Zaituna Khamidullina and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Akbayan TureshevaDepartment of Normal Physiology, West-Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan.
Gulzhanat AimagambetovaDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2868-4497
Talshyn UkybassovaClinical Academic Department of Women's Health, CF "University Medical Center", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Aizada MaratDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology #1, NJSC "Astana Medical University", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Perizat KanabekovaDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Lyazzat KaldygulovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology #2, West-Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan.
Ainur AmanzholkyzyDepartment of Normal Physiology, West-Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan.
Svetlana RyzhkovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology #2, West-Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, Aktobe 030000, Kazakhstan.
Anastassiya NogayDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Zaituna KhamidullinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology #1, NJSC "Astana Medical University", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-5324-8486
Aktoty IlmaliyevaDepartment of Medicine #3, NJSC "Astana Medical University", Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Wassim Y AlmawiFaculte' des Sciences de Tunis, Universite' de Tunis El Manar, Tunis 5000, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-1633-9757
Kuralay AtageldiyevaDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-7048-1511
Astana Medical University · KZWest Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov State Medical University · KZNazarbayev University · KZTunis University · TN

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan AP14870609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss is a complex health challenge with no universally accepted definition. Inconsistency in definitions involves not only the number of spontaneous abortions (two or three) that are accepted for recurrent pregnancy loss but the types of pregnancy and gestational age at miscarriage. Due to the heterogeneity of definitions and criteria applied by international guidelines for recurrent pregnancy loss, the true incidence of recurrent miscarriage, which is reported to range from 1% to 5%, is difficult to estimate. Moreover, the exact etiology of recurrent pregnancy loss remains questionable; thus, it is considered a polyetiological and multifactorial condition with many modifiable and non-modifiable factors involved. Even after thoroughly evaluating recurrent pregnancy loss etiology and risk factors, up to 75% of cases remain unexplained. This review aimed to summarize and critically analyze accumulated knowledge on the etiology, risk factors, relevant diagnostic options, and management approach to recurrent pregnancy loss. The relevance of various factors and their proposed roles in recurrent pregnancy loss pathogenesis remains a matter of discussion. The diagnostic approach and the management largely depend on the etiology and risk factors taken into consideration by a healthcare professional as a cause of recurrent miscarriage for a particular woman or couple. Underestimation of social and health consequences of recurrent pregnancy loss leads to compromised reproductive health and psychological well-being of women after miscarriage. Studies on etiology and risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss, especially idiopathic, should be continued. The existing international guidelines require updates to assist clinical practice.

Indexed as

miscarriagepregnancy lossrecurrent miscarriagerecurrent pregnancy lossRPLRPL management

Identifiers

PMID37373766
PMCPMC10298962
OpenAlexW4380988060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.