Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373698›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Is the Standard Artificial Urinary Sphincter AMS 800 Still a Treatment Option for the Irradiated Male Patient Presenting with a Devastated Bladder Outlet?

Fabian Queissert, Tanja Huesch, Alexander Kretschmer, Ruth Kirschner-Hermanns, Tobias Pottek, Roberto Olianas, Alexander Friedl, Roland Homberg, Jesco Pfitzenmaier, Carsten M Naumann and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 4 countries.

Fabian QueissertDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2486-2740
Tanja HueschDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7872-5496
Alexander KretschmerDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Campus Großhadern, 80539 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6511-4354
Ruth Kirschner-HermannsDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.
Tobias PottekDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Hospital Am Urban, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Roberto OlianasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Lüneburg, 21339 Lüneburg, Germany.
Alexander FriedlDepartment of Urology, Göttlicher Heiland Vienna, 1170 Vienna, Austria.
Roland HombergDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, St. Barbara Hospital Hamm, 59075 Hamm, Germany.
Jesco PfitzenmaierDepartment of Urology, Evangelic Hospital Bethel, 42240 Bielefeld, Germany.
Carsten M NaumannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, 56564 Neuwied, Germany.
Joanne Nyarangi-DixDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Torben HofmannDepartment of Urology, Diakonie Hospital Schwaebisch Hall, 74523 Schwaebisch Hall, Germany.
Achim RoseDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Helios Hospital Duisburg, 47166 Duisburg, Germany.
Christian WeidemannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Catholic Hospital St. Johann Nepomuk, 99097 Erfurt, Germany.
Carola WotzkaDepartment of Urology, Diakonie Hospital Stuttgart, 70176 Stuttgart, Germany.
Wilhelm HübnerDepartment of Urology, Hospital Weinviertel Korneuburg, 2100 Korneuburg, Austria.
Hagen LoertzerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Westpfalz Medical Center, 67655 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Rudi AbdunnurDepartment of Urology, Helios Hospital Schwelm, 58332 Schwelm, Germany.
Markus GrabbertDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.
Ralf AndingDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5020-3445
Ricarda M BauerDepartment of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Campus Großhadern, 80539 Munich, Germany.
Axel HaferkampDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Andres J SchraderDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Debates on Male Incontinence (DOMINO)-Project
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEDiakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart · DEEvangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld · DEHeidelberg University · DEHelios Hospital Schwerin · DEKatholisches Krankenhaus St. Johann Nepomuk · DEKlinikum Lüneburg · DELandesklinikum Korneuburg · ATSt. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEVivantes Klinikum · DEWestpfalz Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCircular urethral compression with an artificial sphincter allows control of voiding, even in patients with severe stress urinary incontinence, but it heightens the risk of urethral atrophy and erosion. This study of one of the largest populations of patients treated with radiotherapy investigates the additive effect of the post-radiogenic stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck on AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter outcomes.

methodsIn a retrospective multicenter cohort study, we analyzed patients fitted with an AMS 800, comparing those who had received radiotherapy with patients presenting a devastated bladder outlet (stricture of the membranous urethra/bladder neck). We determined the correlation between these groups of patients using both univariate and stepwise adjusted multivariate regression. The revision-free interval was estimated by a Kaplan-Meier plot and compared by applying the log-rank test. A

resultsOf the 123 irradiated patients we identified, 62 (50.4%) had undergone at least one prior desobstruction for bladder-neck/urethra stenosis. After a mean follow-up of 21 months, the latter tended to achieve social continence less frequently (25.7% vs. 35%;

conclusionsA devastated bladder outlet is associated with a lower proportion of men with social continence and a significantly higher need for revision compared with irradiated patients without a history of urethral stenosis. Alternative surgical procedures should be discussed beforehand, especially in cases of recurrent urethral stenosis.

Indexed as

AMS 800artificial urinary sphincterbladder neck stenosisdevastated bladder outletmale stress incontinenceprostate radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37373698
PMCPMC10299154
OpenAlexW4380485119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.