ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Whole-Body Patlak [
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring extended [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Whole-body Dynamic [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Giant Cell Arteritis and Polymyalgia Rheumatica.Clinical nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography for predicting treatment response to chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Variability of Metabolic Rate and Distribution Volume Quantification in Whole-Body Parametric PATLAK [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Optimization and impact of sensitivity mode on abbreviated scan protocols with population-based input function for parametric imaging of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStatic [
methodsA total of 34 consecutive patients with indeterminate pulmonary lesions were enrolled in this prospective trial. All patients underwent static (60 min p.i.) and dynamic (0-60 min p.i.) whole-body [
resultsMR-FDG
conclusionsMetabolic rate quantification was shown to be a reliable method to detect malignant lung tumors, LNM, and distant metastases at least as accurately as the established SUV or dual-time-point PET scans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.