Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373510›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Versatile and Accessible Magnetic Diagnosis Platform with Different Types of Magnetic Particles for Liquid and Solid Biopsies.

Ju-Fang Liu, Jean-Hong Chen, Shu-Hsien Liao, Kuen-Lin Chen, Wen-Chun Wei, Ting-Yuan Chen, Jen-Jie Chieh, Kai-Wen Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ju-Fang LiuSchool of Oral Hygiene, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Jean-Hong ChenDepartment of Materials Engineering, Kun Shan University, Tainan 710, Taiwan.
Shu-Hsien LiaoInstitute of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5794-7583
Kuen-Lin ChenDepartment of Physics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Wen-Chun WeiInstitute of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
Ting-Yuan ChenInstitute of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.
Jen-Jie ChiehInstitute of Electro-Optical Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 116, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7144-2637
Kai-Wen HuangGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6375-8714

Funding

the Ministry of Science and Technology (the Republic of China) 108-2221-E-003 -006the Ministry of Science and Technology (the Republic of China) MOST 101-2221-E-003 -005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of liquid and solid biopsies by different instruments makes the clinic loading difficult in many aspects. Given the compositions of magnetic particles (MPs) with diverse characterizations and the innovative acoustic type of vibration sample magnetometer (VSM), the versatile, accessible magnetic diagnosis platform was proposed to meet clinical demands, such as low loading for multiple biopsies. In liquid biopsies of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) standard solutions and subject serums, molecular concentration was analyzed from saturation magnetization by the soft type of Fe

Indexed as

alpha-FetoproteinsLiver NeoplasmsBiopsyHumansMagnetic PhenomenaMagneticsalpha-Fetoproteinsacoustic type of vibration sample magnetometerliquid and solid biopsymagnetic particlessoft and hard magnetic types

Identifiers

PMID37373510
PMCPMC10299023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.