Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373376›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Minimal Residual Disease Assessment and Recurrence Risk in Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Resection with or without Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anusha Chidharla, Eliot Rapoport, Kriti Agarwal, Samragnyi Madala, Brenda Linares, Weijing Sun, Sakti Chakrabarti, Anup Kasi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Novel Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancers.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Anusha ChidharlaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA.
Eliot RapoportDepartment of Internal Medicine, Montefiore Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Kriti AgarwalDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA.
Samragnyi MadalaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 55224, USA.
Brenda LinaresResearch and Learning Department, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66211, USA.
Weijing SunDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA.
Sakti ChakrabartiDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-098X
Anup KasiDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66205, USA.
The University of Kansas Cancer Center · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USHackensack University Medical Center · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging data have suggested that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be a reliable biomarker for minimal residual disease (MRD) in CRC patients. Recent studies have shown that the ability to detect MRD using ctDNA assay after curative-intent surgery will change how to assess the recurrence risk and patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy. We performed a meta-analysis of post-operative ctDNA in stage I-IV (oligometastatic) CRC patients after curative-intent resection. We included 23 studies representing 3568 patients with evaluable ctDNA in CRC patient post-curative-intent surgery. Data were extracted from each study to perform a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4. software. Subsequent subgroup analysis was performed for stages I-III and oligometastatic stage IV CRC patients. Results showed that the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) in post-surgical ctDNA-positive versus -negative patients in all stages was 7.27 (95% CI 5.49-9.62),

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAadjuvant chemotherapycirculating tumor DNAcolorectal cancercurative-intent surgeryminimal residual diseaserecurrence-free survival

Identifiers

PMID37373376
PMCPMC10298915
OpenAlexW4381459961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.