Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373356›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Nicotine and Microvascular Responses in Skeletal Muscle from Acute Exposure to Cigarettes and Vaping.

Christopher R Pitzer, Eiman A Aboaziza, Juliana M O'Reilly, W Kyle Mandler, I Mark Olfert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Maternal use of electronic cigarettes and impact on offspring: a double-hit model.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher R PitzerDivision of Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2529-4880
Eiman A AboazizaWest Virginia Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-7818
Juliana M O'ReillyDivision of Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
W Kyle MandlerDivision of Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
I Mark OlfertDivision of Exercise Physiology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite claims of safety or harm reduction for electronic cigarettes (E-cig) use (also known as vaping), emerging evidence indicates that E-cigs are not likely safe, or necessarily safer than traditional cigarettes, when considering the user's risk of developing vascular dysfunction/disease. E-cigs are different from regular cigarettes in that E-cig devices are highly customizable, and users can change the e-liquid composition (such as the base solution, flavors, and nicotine level). Since the effects of E-cigs on the microvascular responses in skeletal muscle are poorly understood, we used intravital microscopy with an acute (one-time 10 puff) exposure paradigm to evaluate the individual components of e-liquid on vascular tone and endothelial function in the arterioles of the gluteus maximus muscle of anesthetized C57Bl/6 mice. Consistent with the molecular responses seen with endothelial cells, we found that the peripheral vasoconstriction response was similar between mice exposed to E-cig aerosol or cigarette smoke (i.e., 3R4F reference cigarette); this response was not nicotine dependent, and endothelial cell-mediated vasodilation was not altered within this acute exposure paradigm. We also report that, regardless of the base solution component [i.e., vegetable glycerin (VG)-only or propylene glycol (PG)-only], the vasoconstriction responses were the same in mice with inhalation exposure to 3R4F cigarette smoke or E-cig aerosol. Key findings from this work reveal that some component other than nicotine, in inhaled smoke or aerosol, is responsible for triggering peripheral vasoconstriction in skeletal muscle, and that regardless of one's preference for an E-cig base solution composition (i.e., ratio of VG-to-PG), the acute physiological response to blood vessels appears to be the same. The data suggest that vaping is not likely to be 'safer' than smoking towards blood vessels and can be expected to produce and/or result in the same adverse vascular health outcomes associated with smoking cigarettes.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAerosolsAnimalsEndothelial CellsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle, SkeletalNicotineAerosolsNicotine3R4F reference cigaretteE-cigaretteelectronic cigarettee-liquidintravital microscopy

Identifiers

PMID37373356
PMCPMC10299710
OpenAlexW4380877922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.