ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023
Uncharacterized Proteins CxORFx: Subinteractome Analysis and Prognostic Significance in Cancers.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- C1orf226 Promotes Glioma Stemness and Oncogenesis in Glioma via PLK1-Mediated Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Characterization and regulatory mechanism evaluation of C8orf33 in hepatocellular carcinoma through multiomics profiling.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Do Glioma Cells Rewire Neural Circuits through Epigenetic Changes? DNA Methylation Analysis of Genes Involved in Neuron-Glioma Communication in the Human Frontal Cortex.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025Article
- Article
- A comprehensive prognostic and immune infiltration analysis of UBA1 in pan-cancer: A computational analysis and in vitro experiments.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Proteomics and Its Applications in Cancers 2.0.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Functions of about 10% of all the proteins and their associations with diseases are poorly annotated or not annotated at all. Among these proteins, there is a group of uncharacterized chromosome-specific open-reading frame genes (CxORFx) from the 'Tdark' category. The aim of the work was to reveal associations of CxORFx gene expression and ORF proteins' subinteractomes with cancer-driven cellular processes and molecular pathways. We performed systems biology and bioinformatic analysis of 219 differentially expressed CxORFx genes in cancers, an estimation of prognostic significance of novel transcriptomic signatures and analysis of subinteractome composition using several web servers (GEPIA2, KMplotter, ROC-plotter, TIMER, cBioPortal, DepMap, EnrichR, PepPSy, cProSite, WebGestalt, CancerGeneNet, PathwAX II and FunCoup). The subinteractome of each ORF protein was revealed using ten different data sources on physical protein-protein interactions (PPIs) to obtain representative datasets for the exploration of possible cellular functions of ORF proteins through a spectrum of neighboring annotated protein partners. A total of 42 out of 219 presumably cancer-associated ORF proteins and 30 cancer-dependent binary PPIs were found. Additionally, a bibliometric analysis of 204 publications allowed us to retrieve biomedical terms related to ORF genes. In spite of recent progress in functional studies of ORF genes, the current investigations aim at finding out the prognostic value of CxORFx expression patterns in cancers. The results obtained expand the understanding of the possible functions of the poorly annotated CxORFx in the cancer context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.