Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373214›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Quantitative Analysis of Isoform Switching in Cancer.

Georgii Dolgalev, Ekaterina Poverennaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Georgii DolgalevInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119281, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7854-6279
Ekaterina PoverennayaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow 119281, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1838-3604
Institute of Biomedical Chemistry · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 21-74-10061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 8 years, multiple studies examined the phenomenon of isoform switching in human cancers and discovered that isoform switching is widespread, with hundreds to thousands of such events per cancer type. Although all of these studies used slightly different definitions of isoform switching, which in part led to a rather poor overlap of their results, they all leveraged transcript usage, a proportion of the transcript's expression in the total expression level of the parent gene, to detect isoform switching. However, how changes in transcript usage correlate with changes in transcript expression is not sufficiently explored. In this article, we adopt the most common definition of isoform switching and use a state-of-the-art tool for the analysis of differential transcript usage, SatuRn, to detect isoform switching events in 12 cancer types. We analyze the detected events in terms of changes in transcript usage and the relationship between transcript usage and transcript expression on a global scale. The results of our analysis suggest that the relationship between changes in transcript usage and changes in transcript expression is far from straightforward, and that such quantitative information can be effectively used for prioritizing isoform switching events for downstream analyses.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingNeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingHumansProtein IsoformsProtein Isoformsalternative splicingcancerdifferential transcript expressiondifferential transcript usageisoform switchingSatuRntranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID37373214
PMCPMC10298363
OpenAlexW4380611662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.