Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373078›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Molecular-Biology-Driven Frontline Treatment for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Andrea Rizzuto, Angelo Pirrera, Emilia Gigliotta, Salvatrice Mancuso, Candida Vullo, Giulia Maria Camarda, Cristina Rotolo, Arianna Roppolo, Corinne Spoto, Massimo Gentile and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Enhancing medication adherence with blister-packed oral oncolytics: A case example in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea RizzutoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Angelo PirreraDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Emilia GigliottaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Salvatrice MancusoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Candida VulloDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Giulia Maria CamardaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Cristina RotoloDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Arianna RoppoloDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Corinne SpotoDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
Massimo GentileHematology Unit, "Annunziata" Hospital of Cosenza, 87100 Cosenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5256-0726
Cirino BottaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-4504
Sergio SiragusaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (ProMISE), University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITOspedale Annunziata di Cosenza · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) currently relies on the use of chemo-immunotherapy, Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, or BCL2 inhibitors alone or combined with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. However, the availability of multiple choices for the first-line setting and a lack of direct head-to-head comparisons pose a challenge for treatment selection. To overcome these limitations, we performed a systematic review and a network meta-analysis on published randomized clinical trials performed in the first-line treatment setting of CLL. For each study, we retrieved data on progression-free survival (according to del17/P53 and IGHV status), overall response rate, complete response, and incidence of most frequent grade 3-4 adverse event. We identified nine clinical trials encompassing 11 different treatments, with a total of 5288 CLL patients evaluated. We systematically performed separated network meta-analyses (NMA) to evaluate the efficacy/safety of each regimen in the conditions previously described to obtain the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score, which was subsequently used to build separated ranking charts. Interestingly, the combination of obinutuzumab with acalabrutinib reached the top of the chart in each sub-analysis performed, with the exception of the del17/P53mut setting, where it was almost on par with the aCD20 mAbs/ibrutinib combination (SUCRA aCD20-ibrutinib and O-acala: 93.5% and 91%, respectively) and of the safety evaluation, where monotherapies (acalabrutinib in particular) gave better results. Finally, considering that NMA and SUCRA work for single endpoints only, we performed a principal component analysis to recapitulate in a cartesian plane the SUCRA profiles of each schedule according to the results obtained in each sub-analysis, confirming again the superiority of aCD20/BTKi or BCL2i combinations in a first-line setting. Overall, here we demonstrated that: (1) a chemotherapy-free regimen, such as the combination of aCD20 with a BTKi or BCL2i, should be the preferred treatment choice despite biological/molecular characteristics (preferred regimen O-acala); (2) there is less and less room for chemotherapy in the first line treatment of CLL.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzamidesBiologyHumansPyrazinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicacalabrutinibAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesPyrazinesBruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitorschronic lymphocitic leukemiaCLLnetwork metanalysis

Identifiers

PMID37373078
PMCPMC10298034
OpenAlexW4380079202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.