Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37373060›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Hyperoside as a UV Photoprotective or Photostimulating Compound-Evaluation of the Effect of UV Radiation with Selected UV-Absorbing Organic Compounds on Skin Cells.

Anna Moukova, Lukas Malina, Hana Kolarova, Robert Bajgar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna MoukovaDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 3, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Lukas MalinaDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 3, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5734-5921
Hana KolarovaDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 3, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Robert BajgarDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hnevotinska 3, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4854-4114
Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine · CZPalacký University Olomouc · CZ

Funding

European Regional Development Fund CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a non-ionizing radiation, which has a cytotoxic potential, and it is therefore necessary to protect against it. Human skin is exposed to the longer-wavelength components of UV radiation (UVA and UVB) from the sun. In the present paper, we focused on the study of eight organic UV-absorbing compounds: astragalin, beta-carotene, 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone, hyperoside, 3-(4-methylbenzylidene)camphor, pachypodol, and trans-urocanic acid, as possible protectives of skin cells against UVA and UVB radiation. Their protective effects on skin cell viability, ROS production, mitochondrial membrane potential, liposomal permeability, and DNA integrity were investigated. Only some of the compounds studied, such as trans-urocanic acid and hyperoside, had a significant effect on the examined hallmarks of UV-induced cell damage. This was also confirmed by an atomic force microscopy study of morphological changes in HaCaT cells or a study conducted on a 3D skin model. In conclusion, hyperoside was found to be a very effective UV-protective compound, especially against UVA radiation. Commonly used sunscreen compounds such as 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone, 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone, and 3-(4-methylbenzylidene)camphor turned out to be only physical UV filters, and pachypodol with a relatively high absorption in the UVA region was shown to be more phototoxic than photoprotective.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysUrocanic AcidBenzophenonesCamphorHumansQuercetinSkinSunscreening Agents2,4-dihydroxybenzophenoneBenzophenonesCamphorenzacamenehyperosideoxybenzoneQuercetinSunscreening AgentsUrocanic Acid2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone3-(4-methylbenzylidene)camphorastragalinbeta-carotenehyperosidepachypodolphototoxicitytrans-urocanic acidUV-absorbing compounds

Identifiers

PMID37373060
PMCPMC10298051
OpenAlexW4380087257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.