Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372874›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

The Right to Refuse: Understanding Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Patient Autonomy in Emergency Care.

Ahmed M Al-Wathinani, Dennis G Barten, Hind Alsahli, Anfal Alhamid, Waad Alghamdi, Wadha Alqahtani, Raghad Alghamdi, Mohammad Aljuaid, Nawaf A Albaqami, Krzysztof Goniewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ahmed M Al-WathinaniDepartment of Emergency Medical Services, Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-7905-1497
Dennis G BartenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, 5912 BL Venlo, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7185-9491
Hind AlsahliPharmaceutical Care Division, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11211, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5728-8450
Anfal AlhamidPrimary Care Clinic and Emergency Department, Dental University Hospital-KSUMC, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Waad AlghamdiDepartment of Respiratory Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh 1154, Saudi Arabia.
Wadha AlqahtaniDepartment of Respiratory Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh 1154, Saudi Arabia.
Raghad AlghamdiDepartment of Respiratory Services, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard, Riyadh 1154, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad AljuaidDepartment of Health Administration, College of Business Administration, King Saud University, Riyadh 11541, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9339-822X
Nawaf A AlbaqamiDepartment of Emergency Medical Services, Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Krzysztof GoniewiczDepartment of Security Studies, Polish Air Force University, 08-521 Dęblin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-6850

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare providers in prehospital care and emergency departments are often at the frontline of medical crises, facing a range of ethical dilemmas, particularly when it comes to patients refusing treatment. This study aimed to delve into the attitudes of these providers toward treatment refusal, unearthing the strategies they employ in navigating such challenging situations while actively working in prehospital emergency health services. Our findings showed that, as the participants' age and experience increased, so did their inclination to respect patient autonomy and avoid persuading them to change their decision about treatment. It was noted that doctors, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians demonstrated a deeper understanding of patients' rights than other medical specialists. However, even with this understanding, the prioritization of patients' rights tended to diminish in life-threatening situations, giving rise to ethical dilemmas. This underlines the complexity of balancing the healthcare professionals' responsibilities and the patients' autonomy, which can generate ethically challenging scenarios for those working in emergency healthcare. By investigating these attitudes and experiences, this study seeks to foster a more profound understanding of the ethical quandaries faced by emergency healthcare providers. Our ultimate aim is to contribute to the development of effective strategies that support both patients and professionals in managing these tough circumstances.

Indexed as

emergency careethical dilemmashealthcare providerspatient autonomyprehospital caretreatment refusal

Identifiers

PMID37372874
PMCPMC10297854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.