Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372854›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Physicians' Trust in Relevant Institutions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Binary Logistic Model.

Tudor-Ștefan Rotaru, Aida Puia, Ștefan Cojocaru, Ovidiu Alexinschi, Cristina Gavrilovici, Liviu Oprea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tudor-Ștefan RotaruDepartment of Bioethics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7022-2894
Aida PuiaDepartment of Community Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400347 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ștefan CojocaruDepartment of Sociology and Social Work, University "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" of Iași, 700506 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4873-5340
Ovidiu AlexinschiDepartment IIIA, "Socola" Institute of Psychiatry, 700282 Iași, Romania.
Cristina GavriloviciDepartment of Mother and Child, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1994-6299
Liviu OpreaDepartment of Bioethics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr. T. Popa" Iași, 700115 Iași, Romania.
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROAlexandru Ioan Cuza University · ROIuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little research has been done on professionals' perceptions of institutions and governments during epidemics. We aim to create a profile of physicians who feel they can raise public health issues with relevant institutions during a pandemic. A total of 1285 Romanian physicians completed an online survey as part of a larger study. We used binary logistic regression to profile physicians who felt they were able to raise public health issues with relevant institutions. Five predictors could differentiate between respondents who tended to agree with the trust statement and those who tended to disagree: feeling safe at work during the pandemic, considering the financial incentive worth the risk, receiving training on the use of protective equipment, having the same values as colleagues, and enjoying work as much as before the pandemic. Physicians who trusted the system to raise public health issues with the appropriate institutions were more likely to feel that they shared the same values as their colleagues, to say they were trained to use protective equipment during the pandemic, to feel that they were safe at work during the pandemic, to enjoy their work as much as before the pandemic, and to feel that the financial bonus justified the risk.

Indexed as

responsibilitytrustwillingness to work

Identifiers

PMID37372854
PMCPMC10298316
OpenAlexW4380485770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.