Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372688›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

The Co-Design/Co-Development and Evaluation of an Online Frailty Check Application for Older Adults: Participatory Action Research with Older Adults.

Bo-Kyung Son, Takahiro Miura, Ken-Ichiro Yabu, Yuka Sumikawa, Dongyool Kim, Weida Lyu, Yingxue Yang, Moeko Tanaka, Tomoki Tanaka, Yasuyo Yoshizawa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bo-Kyung SonInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Takahiro MiuraInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7748-9567
Ken-Ichiro YabuInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Yuka SumikawaDivision of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Dongyool KimDepartment of Agribusiness Management, Faculty of International Agriculture and Food Studies, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6779-8772
Weida LyuInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Yingxue YangGraduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Moeko TanakaDivision of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Tomoki TanakaInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Yasuyo YoshizawaInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Katsuya IijimaInstitute of Gerontology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1339-5681
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology · JPUniversity of Tokyo Health Sciences · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo University of Agriculture · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is an age-related condition characterized by a decline in physical capacity with an increased vulnerability to stressors. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was considerable progression in frailty in older adults. Therefore, an online frailty check (FC) is required for continuous screening, especially acceptable to older adults. We aimed to co-design/co-develop an online FC application with FC supporters who were facilitators in a pre-existing onsite FC program in the community. It consisted of a self-assessment of sarcopenia and an 11-item questionnaire assessing dietary, physical, and social behaviors. Opinions obtained from FC supporters (median 74.0 years) were categorized and implemented. The usability was assessed using the system usability scale (SUS). For both FC supporters and participants (n = 43), the mean score was 70.2 ± 10.3 points, which implied a "marginally high" acceptability and a "good" adjective range. Multiple regression analysis showed that the SUS score was significantly correlated with onsite-online reliability, even after adjusting for age, sex, education level, and ICT proficiency (b = 0.400, 95% CI: 0.243-1.951,

Indexed as

COVID-19FrailtyAgedFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndependent LivingPandemicsReproducibility of Resultsco-designco-developmentolder adultsonline frailty check applicationparticipatory action researchreliability

Identifiers

PMID37372688
PMCPMC10297892
OpenAlexW4380367262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.