Occupational Health Risk Assessment for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in Kanpur, India.

Folake Monsurat Babalola, Lena Breitenmoser, Claire Furlong, Paul Campling, Christine Maria Hooijmans

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Folake Monsurat BabalolaIHE Delft, Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-3787-2756

Lena BreitenmoserInstitute for Ecopreneurship, School of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Hofackerstrasse 30, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7024-6124

Claire FurlongIHE Delft, Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-5516

Paul CamplingVITO, Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium.

Christine Maria HooijmansIHE Delft, Institute for Water Education, Westvest 7, 2611 AX Delft, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment and reuse of wastewater for irrigation can lead to occupational health risks for sewage treatment plant (STP) workers and farmers. Sanitation Safety Planning (SSP) is an approach which can be used to measure and mitigate these risks. This paper explores what impact a novel secondary treatment process, consisting of an integrated permeate channel (IPC) membrane combined with a constructed wetland plus, has on the occupational health risks compared with the existing activated sludge wastewater treatment process and reuse system in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh. A mixed methodology was used, which included key informant interviews, structured observations, and

Indexed as

Escherichia coliWater PurificationChildHumansIndiaRisk AssessmentWaste Disposal, FluidWastewaterWastewateragricultural reuseconstructed wetland plusintegrated permeate channel membranesanitation safety planningsemi-quantitative risk assessmenttechnological control measures

Identifiers

PMID37372659

DOI10.3390/ijerph20126072

PMCPMC10298189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.