Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37372551›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Consumer Intention towards Buying Edible Beef Offal and the Relevance of Food Neophobia.

Maria Sabbagh, Luciano Gutierrez, Roberto Lai, Giuseppe Nocella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria SabbaghDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7425-3279
Luciano GutierrezDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3450-2514
Roberto LaiCooperativa Produttori Arborea-Società Agricola, 09092 Arborea, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4932-2903
Giuseppe NocellaDepartment of Applied Economics and Marketing, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6UR, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9625-6315
University of Sassari · ITUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Regione Autonoma della Sardegna PSR 2014/2020 - sottomisura 16.2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing the willingness to eat edible offal can be a valuable strategy to mitigate the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to growing meat production and to provide food with high protein content to a growing global population. Although some edible offal is considered delicacies, we hardly find such foods in Western countries' everyday diet, and their human consumption has decreased during the last decades. This study analyses the consumer purchase intention of BEEF edible offal using an extended version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), where food neophobia and food disgust sensitivity play an essential role in determining consumers' willingness to eat beef edible offal. An online survey was conducted among a sample of Italian adult regular meat eaters (

Indexed as

consumptionedible offalfood disgust sensitivityfood neophobiatheory of planned behaviour

Identifiers

PMID37372551
PMCPMC10297378
OpenAlexW4380324439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.